<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Atheism Is A Religion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:54:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Walter Nuñez</title>
		<link>http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Nuñez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/?p=41#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Why ask? Isn&#039;t it pretty obvious? Are you not entitled to your own opinion? Everyone does, is it, especially so in a democratic country like ours. Haven&#039;t you heard of freedom of expression and freedom of speech?

The practical point being so that atheists may know that atheism is a religion insofar as the practical definition of the term is concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why ask? Isn&#8217;t it pretty obvious? Are you not entitled to your own opinion? Everyone does, is it, especially so in a democratic country like ours. Haven&#8217;t you heard of freedom of expression and freedom of speech?</p>
<p>The practical point being so that atheists may know that atheism is a religion insofar as the practical definition of the term is concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesusatheist</title>
		<link>http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>jesusatheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/?p=41#comment-73</guid>
		<description>who gave you the freedom to say that we are entitled to our opinions? so what if atheism is a religion? what&#039;s the practical  point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who gave you the freedom to say that we are entitled to our opinions? so what if atheism is a religion? what&#8217;s the practical  point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Nuñez</title>
		<link>http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Nuñez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/?p=41#comment-61</guid>
		<description>In response to your comments:

On your first point: &quot;You’re an idiots comment makes total sence.&quot; Well, that&#039;s your personal opinion, but that doesn&#039;t mean that you&#039;re right.

On your second point &quot;I believe that the world was created when 1000 years ago a unicorn let a big fart. That is my religion. You don’t believe me? Well, in that case your ‘not believing’ in the power of a unicorn’s fart is a religion as well.
You made up a story, atheists don’t care about your story and see no reason to believe it. That doesn’t make the ‘not caring’ a religion.&quot; 

Certainly so! According to the legal definition provided for by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, even not believing or the attitude of nonbelief, disbelief, unbelief and even suspension of belief is a religion, since it defines religion as what the person professes. So here&#039;s some piece of unsolicited advice: Beware of the pitfalls of definition. Make sure that you meant what you have in mind, since definition has many ramifications.  

On your third point: &quot;There is no empirical basis for NOT believing something that doesn’t have an empirical basis?&quot; Well, that may be. But, have you also realized that the preceding statement itself, is not a statement of fact, but only an assumption that needs to be proved in the first place. The part that says: &quot;that doesn’t have an empirical basis?&quot; is nothing but a statement of belief as well. According to the rules of logic: absence of evidence is not an evidence of absence.

On your fourth point: &quot;That statement is almost funny…
Go tell that story in any university where decent science is conducted and they will wipe the floor with you… Seriously…&quot;

But the twist of irony is: who&#039;s funnier now?

In the end, we may not agree on some points, but you are entitled to your own opinion, and I respect that. God bless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to your comments:</p>
<p>On your first point: &#8220;You’re an idiots comment makes total sence.&#8221; Well, that&#8217;s your personal opinion, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that you&#8217;re right.</p>
<p>On your second point &#8220;I believe that the world was created when 1000 years ago a unicorn let a big fart. That is my religion. You don’t believe me? Well, in that case your ‘not believing’ in the power of a unicorn’s fart is a religion as well.<br />
You made up a story, atheists don’t care about your story and see no reason to believe it. That doesn’t make the ‘not caring’ a religion.&#8221; </p>
<p>Certainly so! According to the legal definition provided for by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, even not believing or the attitude of nonbelief, disbelief, unbelief and even suspension of belief is a religion, since it defines religion as what the person professes. So here&#8217;s some piece of unsolicited advice: Beware of the pitfalls of definition. Make sure that you meant what you have in mind, since definition has many ramifications.  </p>
<p>On your third point: &#8220;There is no empirical basis for NOT believing something that doesn’t have an empirical basis?&#8221; Well, that may be. But, have you also realized that the preceding statement itself, is not a statement of fact, but only an assumption that needs to be proved in the first place. The part that says: &#8220;that doesn’t have an empirical basis?&#8221; is nothing but a statement of belief as well. According to the rules of logic: absence of evidence is not an evidence of absence.</p>
<p>On your fourth point: &#8220;That statement is almost funny…<br />
Go tell that story in any university where decent science is conducted and they will wipe the floor with you… Seriously…&#8221;</p>
<p>But the twist of irony is: who&#8217;s funnier now?</p>
<p>In the end, we may not agree on some points, but you are entitled to your own opinion, and I respect that. God bless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/?p=41#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Oh and Ben&#039;s reply is the dumbest I have ever read. I&#039;m sorry.

There is no empirical basis for NOT believing something that doesn&#039;t have an empirical basis?

That statement is almost funny... 
Go tell that story in any university where decent science is conducted and they will wipe the floor with you... Seriously...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and Ben&#8217;s reply is the dumbest I have ever read. I&#8217;m sorry.</p>
<p>There is no empirical basis for NOT believing something that doesn&#8217;t have an empirical basis?</p>
<p>That statement is almost funny&#8230;<br />
Go tell that story in any university where decent science is conducted and they will wipe the floor with you&#8230; Seriously&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/?p=41#comment-57</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re an idiots comment makes total sence.

I believe that the world was created when 1000 years ago a unicorn let a big fart.
That is my religion. 
You don&#039;t believe me? Well, in that case your &#039;not believing&#039; in the power of a unicorn&#039;s fart is a religion as well.

You made up a story, atheists don&#039;t care about your story and see no reason to believe it. That doesn&#039;t make the &#039;not caring&#039; a religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re an idiots comment makes total sence.</p>
<p>I believe that the world was created when 1000 years ago a unicorn let a big fart.<br />
That is my religion.<br />
You don&#8217;t believe me? Well, in that case your &#8216;not believing&#8217; in the power of a unicorn&#8217;s fart is a religion as well.</p>
<p>You made up a story, atheists don&#8217;t care about your story and see no reason to believe it. That doesn&#8217;t make the &#8216;not caring&#8217; a religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Nuñez</title>
		<link>http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Nuñez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/?p=41#comment-32</guid>
		<description>You criticized without understanding. Obviously, you even don&#039;t know what you are talking about. Your point is farfetched! If only you plumbed the depths of how I qualify atheism, et. al. as a religion. Then maybe it shall dawn on you that your point in the first place is moot. I felt sorry for you brother! You are only talking at cross purpose. What you have been ranting and raving about is nothing but semantic problem. It will do you good if you check your semantics. God bless you brother!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You criticized without understanding. Obviously, you even don&#8217;t know what you are talking about. Your point is farfetched! If only you plumbed the depths of how I qualify atheism, et. al. as a religion. Then maybe it shall dawn on you that your point in the first place is moot. I felt sorry for you brother! You are only talking at cross purpose. What you have been ranting and raving about is nothing but semantic problem. It will do you good if you check your semantics. God bless you brother!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You're an Idiot</title>
		<link>http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>You're an Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/?p=41#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll sum it up in one line : 

If atheism is a religion then not collecting stamps is a hobby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll sum it up in one line : </p>
<p>If atheism is a religion then not collecting stamps is a hobby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Nuñez</title>
		<link>http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Nuñez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/?p=41#comment-9</guid>
		<description>To Ben Vallejo: You hit it on the dot brother! That&#039;s what this clarification and exposition is attempting to address. Thanks for the comment! Long live the faith!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Ben Vallejo: You hit it on the dot brother! That&#8217;s what this clarification and exposition is attempting to address. Thanks for the comment! Long live the faith!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Nuñez</title>
		<link>http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Nuñez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/?p=41#comment-8</guid>
		<description>To anonymous: Okay, noted. Sorry for the inadvertent inclusion. I will coordinate this to our technical staff to make the necessary rectification as soon as possible. Nevertheless, thanks for the information. Godspeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To anonymous: Okay, noted. Sorry for the inadvertent inclusion. I will coordinate this to our technical staff to make the necessary rectification as soon as possible. Nevertheless, thanks for the information. Godspeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Nuñez</title>
		<link>http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/2010/02/why-atheism-is-a-religion/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Nuñez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinocatholicdefenders.com/?p=41#comment-7</guid>
		<description>To Pinoy Katoliko: Hi there! I appreciate your comment. Thanks! Keep up the faith!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Pinoy Katoliko: Hi there! I appreciate your comment. Thanks! Keep up the faith!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
